How about 'wprov'?
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Dan Garry dgarry@wikimedia.org wrote:
I'd really rather this be either something that's totally not understandable by the user (e.g. ?saf=1), or something that is clearly understandable (e.g. ?appshareafact=1).
Dan
On 4 March 2015 at 12:26, Adam Baso abaso@wikimedia.org wrote:
Ha! I'm cool with 'provenance' if no one objects.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Andrew Otto aotto@wikimedia.org wrote:
Oof, only that it is ugly! :)
Can you just call it ‘provenance', or are you trying to be more future proof?
On Mar 4, 2015, at 12:11, Adam Baso abaso@wikimedia.org wrote:
I pinged on Phabricator at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90606 about modeling after that patch. That sort of approach should avoid cache fragmentation.
As for parameter name, 'wmfxan' is short and I think would avoid collisions. Any problems with this parameter name?
-Adam
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Nuria Ruiz nuria@wikimedia.org wrote:
Ping ... (regarding cache question)
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Gergo Tisza gtisza@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Nuria Ruiz nuria@wikimedia.org wrote:
- What about caching?
Is this page:* http://wikipedia.org/BarackObama?some_param=some-value http://wikipedia.org/BarackObama?some_param=some-value* being served from the cache as it should be?
The file download parameter was handled via this patch: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/120617/ Seems like an analogous scenario.
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
-- Dan Garry Associate Product Manager, Mobile Apps Wikimedia Foundation
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics