I'd really rather this be either something that's totally not understandable by the user (e.g. ?saf=1), or something that is clearly understandable (e.g. ?appshareafact=1).Dan--On 4 March 2015 at 12:26, Adam Baso <abaso@wikimedia.org> wrote:Ha! I'm cool with 'provenance' if no one objects.On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Andrew Otto <aotto@wikimedia.org> wrote:Oof, only that it is ugly! :)Can you just call it ‘provenance', or are you trying to be more future proof?On Mar 4, 2015, at 12:11, Adam Baso <abaso@wikimedia.org> wrote:I pinged on Phabricator at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T90606 about modeling after that patch. That sort of approach should avoid cache fragmentation.As for parameter name, 'wmfxan' is short and I think would avoid collisions. Any problems with this parameter name?-AdamOn Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Nuria Ruiz <nuria@wikimedia.org> wrote:Ping ... (regarding cache question)On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Gergo Tisza <gtisza@wikimedia.org> wrote:_______________________________________________On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Nuria Ruiz <nuria@wikimedia.org> wrote:2. What about caching?Is this page: http://wikipedia.org/BarackObama?some_param=some-value being served from the cache as it should be?The file download parameter was handled via this patch: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/120617/Seems like an analogous scenario.
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Dan GarryAssociate Product Manager, Mobile AppsWikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics