Well, Oliver, and David, too, don't go
congratulating on how you showed'em yet. That's
bad taste, guys.
See, I'm not trying to "impersonate" or
"second-guess" poor new editors, and I'm quite
sure, from where I stand, that whatever some
piece of blog says, I don't show "mind fallacy"
in my reasoning because I just did not mention
here another people's experience at all. Simple, eh?
Of course, I'm not native English speaker, so,
obviously, I'm expressing myself unclearly
and/or awkwardly.
So, one more (last) time:
1) I profess no "love" for the old interface, and
2) I do not compare merits of old and visual
interfaces at all.
I say that
3) you won't get your indirectly expected
results (participation) but you'll surely get
unexpected (?) results (breakage) because
4) introducing new I/O component of that kind of
complexity will surely break things in existing
text corpus formed with the previous component,
such as it was.
What, am I stating the obvious? Sorry, then.
Yury