Hi all,
Just a quick thought occurred to me while I was working on the {{Template:User wikipedia/Tech ambassador}} template for Wikipedia-en - is there anything further we could do to promote the "group/project"?
I was thinking of maybe working on *Wikipedia:Tech Ambassadors*, but thought I should get some comments from everyone else first before being bold.
1. Does the Tech Ambassador program need promoting? 2. Is Wikipedia: namespace the correct/most appropriate place for a page to exist?
Looking forward to your comments.
Meta should have the overarching page, though what it means for enWP and how it is used at enWP deserves local coverage.
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 01:48 Samuel Tarling samtarling6@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Just a quick thought occurred to me while I was working on the {{Template:User wikipedia/Tech ambassador}} template for Wikipedia-en - is there anything further we could do to promote the "group/project"?
I was thinking of maybe working on *Wikipedia:Tech Ambassadors*, but thought I should get some comments from everyone else first before being bold.
- Does the Tech Ambassador program need promoting?
- Is Wikipedia: namespace the correct/most appropriate place for a
page to exist?
Looking forward to your comments.
-- Samuel Tarling (User:Samtar on wp-en) www.samtarling.co.uk _______________________________________________ Wikitech-ambassadors mailing list Wikitech-ambassadors@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-ambassadors
Why still another enwiki page that should be on Meta?
Il 31/08/2015 17:45, Samuel Tarling ha scritto:
Hi all,
Just a quick thought occurred to me while I was working on the {{Template:User wikipedia/Tech ambassador}} template for Wikipedia-en
- is there anything further we could do to promote the "group/project"?
I was thinking of maybe working on /Wikipedia:Tech Ambassadors/, but thought I should get some comments from everyone else first before being bold.
- Does the Tech Ambassador program need promoting?
- Is Wikipedia: namespace the correct/most appropriate place for a page to exist?
Looking forward to your comments.
-- Samuel Tarling (User:Samtar on wp-en) www.samtarling.co.uk http://www.samtarling.co.uk
Wikitech-ambassadors mailing list Wikitech-ambassadors@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-ambassadors
To try to increase uptake in the the Tech Ambassadors and subscribers to this mailing list. Please see https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T105941
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Ricordisamoa ricordisamoa@openmailbox.org wrote:
Why still another enwiki page that should be on Meta?
Il 31/08/2015 17:45, Samuel Tarling ha scritto:
Hi all,
Just a quick thought occurred to me while I was working on the {{Template:User wikipedia/Tech ambassador}} template for Wikipedia-en - is there anything further we could do to promote the "group/project"?
I was thinking of maybe working on *Wikipedia:Tech Ambassadors*, but thought I should get some comments from everyone else first before being bold.
- Does the Tech Ambassador program need promoting?
- Is Wikipedia: namespace the correct/most appropriate place for a
page to exist?
Looking forward to your comments.
-- Samuel Tarling (User:Samtar on wp-en) www.samtarling.co.uk
Wikitech-ambassadors mailing listWikitech-ambassadors@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-ambassadors
Wikitech-ambassadors mailing list Wikitech-ambassadors@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-ambassadors
wikitech-ambassadors@lists.wikimedia.org