Accumulate a log from IRC, and write a todo-list regularly. Ie, the todo-list will contain both users and articles.
I have done some processing on the squid logs, and it seems like there are a time limit when all pages are visited. I think the todo-list can be compared to the complete list of articles and all that has not been on the the todo-list can be expected to need a rewrite of the trust if any one of the contributors are listed on the todo-list.
John
Aaron Schulz skrev:
As to the first question, unfortunately no, only squid hit logs are maintained.
-Aaron Schulz
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:39:20 -0700 From: luca@dealfaro.org To: wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikiquality-l] WikiTrust v2 released: reputation andtrustforyour wiki in real-time!
Regarding the issue of long-untouched pages:
- are there some statistics, in mediawiki, that allow a process to
check how many times a page has been accessed? I can of course add a new hook and a db table, but it may not work due to caching, and as this would run for every hit, I don't want to increase load.
- The best way to add this reconsideration of long-unchanged pages is
to implement it as a batch process, i.e., not run from apache. This would mean that the job can be run as a cron job, or as a daemon, or something like that, in the background, at low enough rate not to cause trouble. Does this approach sound satisfactory to you?
Oh, and what is en.labs?
Luca
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:42 AM, mike.lifeguard <mike.lifeguard@gmail.com mailto:mike.lifeguard@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, en.labs would be best, as it is a site for testing :D But yes, English Wikibooks is a good candidate once we have explored the issue of long-untouched pages (ie the trust should be recalculated, I think) Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* wikiquality-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:wikiquality-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org> [mailto:wikiquality-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:wikiquality-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org>] *On Behalf Of *Luca de Alfaro *Sent:* August 26, 2008 10:59 PM *To:* Wikimedia Quality Discussions *Subject:* Re: [Wikiquality-l] WikiTrust v2 released: reputation andtrustforyour wiki in real-time! Yes, I fully agree. We should start on a small project where people are interested. We can consider the bigger wikis later, once we are confident that we like it and it works the way we want. I was citing Enwiki just to discuss potential performance. Ian and I can help with advice etc anyone who wants to try this out. Luca On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Andrew Whitworth <wknight8111@gmail.com <mailto:wknight8111@gmail.com>> wrote: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:42 PM, mike.lifeguard <mike.lifeguard@gmail.com <mailto:mike.lifeguard@gmail.com>> wrote: >>even on the English Wikipedia (5 edits / second at most?) a single CPU >> would suffice But why start so large? Pick a smaller test wiki first like, say, en.wikibooks? We can throw that into the queue of things we want installed down at WB. --Andrew Whitworth _______________________________________________ Wikiquality-l mailing list Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l _______________________________________________ Wikiquality-l mailing list Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
Get thousands of games on your PC, your mobile phone, and the web with Windows®. Game with Windows
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/108588800/direct/01/
Wikiquality-l mailing list Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l