Accumulate a log from IRC, and write a todo-list regularly. Ie, the
todo-list will contain both users and articles.
I have done some processing on the squid logs, and it seems like there
are a time limit when all pages are visited. I think the todo-list can
be compared to the complete list of articles and all that has not been
on the the todo-list can be expected to need a rewrite of the trust if
any one of the contributors are listed on the todo-list.
John
Aaron Schulz skrev:
As to the first question, unfortunately no, only squid
hit logs are
maintained.
-Aaron Schulz
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:39:20 -0700
From: luca(a)dealfaro.org
To: wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikiquality-l] WikiTrust v2 released: reputation
andtrustforyour wiki in real-time!
Regarding the issue of long-untouched pages:
1) are there some statistics, in mediawiki, that allow a process to
check how many times a page has been accessed? I can of course add a
new hook and a db table, but it may not work due to caching, and as
this would run for every hit, I don't want to increase load.
2) The best way to add this reconsideration of long-unchanged pages is
to implement it as a batch process, i.e., not run from apache. This
would mean that the job can be run as a cron job, or as a daemon, or
something like that, in the background, at low enough rate not to
cause trouble. Does this approach sound satisfactory to you?
Oh, and what is en.labs?
Luca
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:42 AM, mike.lifeguard
<mike.lifeguard(a)gmail.com <mailto:mike.lifeguard@gmail.com>> wrote:
Well, en.labs would be best, as it is a site for testing :D But
yes, English Wikibooks is a good candidate once we have explored
the issue of long-untouched pages (ie the trust should be
recalculated, I think)
Mike
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* wikiquality-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:wikiquality-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org>
[mailto:wikiquality-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:wikiquality-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org>] *On Behalf Of
*Luca de Alfaro
*Sent:* August 26, 2008 10:59 PM
*To:* Wikimedia Quality Discussions
*Subject:* Re: [Wikiquality-l] WikiTrust v2 released: reputation
andtrustforyour wiki in real-time!
Yes, I fully agree.
We should start on a small project where people are interested.
We can consider the bigger wikis later, once we are confident that
we like it and it works the way we want.
I was citing Enwiki just to discuss potential performance.
Ian and I can help with advice etc anyone who wants to try this out.
Luca
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Andrew Whitworth
<wknight8111(a)gmail.com <mailto:wknight8111@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:42 PM, mike.lifeguard
<mike.lifeguard(a)gmail.com <mailto:mike.lifeguard@gmail.com>> wrote:
>even on the English Wikipedia (5 edits /
second at most?) a
single CPU
> would suffice
But why start so large? Pick a smaller test wiki first like, say,
en.wikibooks? We can throw that into the queue of things we want
installed down at WB.
--Andrew Whitworth
_______________________________________________
Wikiquality-l mailing list
Wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
_______________________________________________
Wikiquality-l mailing list
Wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get thousands of games on your PC, your mobile phone, and the web with
Windows®. Game with Windows
<http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/108588800/direct/01/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Wikiquality-l mailing list
Wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l