Yes, that looks better. I think the best option would be if there would be a draft link that disappears after clicking and instead, the edit button would appear. Most people would notice that. Or even better, if "draft" would turn into "edit" (or "edit draft") in line with our older discussion of keeping the number of tabs minimal?
Bye,
Philipp
2007/9/4, Aaron Schulz jschulz_4587@msn.com:
Yeah, the edit tab on history pages can be a bit confusing. I've been playing around with tab schemes now. See http://amidaniel.com/testwiki/index.php/Sun
-Aaron Schulz
From: "P. Birken" pbirken@gmail.com Reply-To: Wikimedia Quality Discussions wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org To: "Wikimedia Quality Discussions" wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikiquality-l] Issues with FlaggedRevs Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:54:48 +0200
Aw man, templates suck!
After some more surfing, I can only say that the current situation is already confusing enough. For example, when an IP does not see an edit button, but clicks on "History", the edit-button appears. Mh. Somehow, Arnomanes idea of an editbutton that behaves situation dependend becomes more appealing, as dows the main GUI. I'lll think some more on this.
I found one more minor point that could improve usability: in the Reviewing Box, the review button could be moved to the right of the selector menus. The point is, that in the case that there is only one dimension of flags, this makes the box much more compact (the button would be where "Depth" is now). And I think most wikis will use this setting.
Best wishes,
Philipp
Discover sweet stuff waiting for you at the Messenger Cafe. Claim your treat today! http://www.cafemessenger.com/info/info_sweetstuff.html?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_SeptHM...
Wikiquality-l mailing list Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l