Yes, that looks better. I think the best option would be if there
would be a draft link that disappears after clicking and instead, the
edit button would appear. Most people would notice that. Or even
better, if "draft" would turn into "edit" (or "edit draft")
in line
with our older discussion of keeping the number of tabs minimal?
Bye,
Philipp
2007/9/4, Aaron Schulz <jschulz_4587(a)msn.com>om>:
Yeah, the edit tab on history pages can be a bit
confusing. I've been
playing around with tab schemes now. See
http://amidaniel.com/testwiki/index.php/Sun
-Aaron Schulz
From: "P. Birken"
<pbirken(a)gmail.com>
Reply-To: Wikimedia Quality Discussions <wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
To: "Wikimedia Quality Discussions" <wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [Wikiquality-l] Issues with FlaggedRevs
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:54:48 +0200
Aw man, templates suck!
After some more surfing, I can only say that the current situation is
already confusing enough. For example, when an IP does not see an edit
button, but clicks on "History", the edit-button appears. Mh. Somehow,
Arnomanes idea of an editbutton that behaves situation dependend
becomes more appealing, as dows the main GUI. I'lll think some more on
this.
I found one more minor point that could improve usability: in the
Reviewing Box, the review button could be moved to the right of the
selector menus. The point is, that in the case that there is only one
dimension of flags, this makes the box much more compact (the button
would be where "Depth" is now). And I think most wikis will use this
setting.
Best wishes,
Philipp
_________________________________________________________________
Discover sweet stuff waiting for you at the Messenger Cafe. Claim your
treat today!
http://www.cafemessenger.com/info/info_sweetstuff.html?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_SeptH…
_______________________________________________
Wikiquality-l mailing list
Wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l