On 4/2/07, P. Birken pbirken@gmail.com wrote:
It has turned out, that having multiple levels for a single flag makes things complicated, for example when looking at the feature of reviewing versions from a diff. Following is a copy of the above namend textfile, where I have added priority levels to the features that are not yet done. Based on this, Jörg will decide what to do next. Priority 1 is the highest.
This all looks good; we should be able to attract more volunteer developers once it becomes clear that this is going to be the system that is put into action. One comment -
- implicit tagging: should this tag be implicitly set by any user
within the associated group when editing? (this will be used for the "non-vandalized" tag)
###Todo: do it ###Priority: 7
I think that's pretty important to have; if want vandalism review (which is going to have the biggest PR impact) to be scalable, we need to be able to flag lots of changes by trusted users automatically as non-vandalism.