On 4/2/07, P. Birken <pbirken(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It has turned out, that having
multiple levels for a single flag makes things complicated, for
example when looking at the feature of reviewing versions from a diff.
Following is a copy of the above namend textfile, where I have added
priority levels to the features that are not yet done. Based on this,
Jörg will decide what to do next. Priority 1 is the highest.
This all looks good; we should be able to attract more volunteer
developers once it becomes clear that this is going to be the system
that is put into action. One comment -
- implicit tagging: should this tag be implicitly set
by any user
within the associated group when editing? (this will be used for the
"non-vandalized" tag)
###Todo: do it
###Priority: 7
I think that's pretty important to have; if want vandalism review
(which is going to have the biggest PR impact) to be scalable, we need
to be able to flag lots of changes by trusted users automatically as
non-vandalism.
--
Peace & Love,
Erik
DISCLAIMER: This message does not represent an official position of
the Wikimedia Foundation or its Board of Trustees.
"An old, rigid civilization is reluctantly dying. Something new, open,
free and exciting is waking up." -- Ming the Mechanic