1) As for new articles, it only takes one click to review it, and often pages start off pretty rate, so some users may end up wanting to unreview it for a while then. 2) I don't know what you must be referring to by "the creation of new versions by trusted users in the case that the current version is sighted. Then, diffs are not needed for reviewing." Are you referring to a trusted user editing a page that is already sighted? Again, if they add a template/image, you cannot just take the current version of those templates/images and make them part of a sighted revision. If while I was adding an image to a reviewed page, as a reviewer, the image was vandalized, you'd end up with a bad stable version.
As for 1), some of the same problems apply as well.
-Aaron Schulz
From: "P. Birken" pbirken@gmail.com Reply-To: Wikimedia Quality Discussions wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org To: "Wikimedia Quality Discussions" wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikiquality-l] Issues with FlaggedRevs Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:54:32 +0200
2007/8/15, Aaron Schulz jschulz_4587@msn.com:
What you cannot do is just have a diff shown on edit and have it review *and* save at the same time. As long is the review is done after the
save,
it's fine.
OK, but that's not a problem. The setting Erik and I are talking about are twofold, namely the creation of new articles by trusted users and the creation of new versions by trusted users in the case that the current version is sighted. Then, diffs are not needed for reviewing.
Bye,
Philipp
Wikiquality-l mailing list Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
_________________________________________________________________ Learn.Laugh.Share. Reallivemoms is right place! http://www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us