1) As for new articles, it only takes one click to review it, and often
pages start off pretty rate, so some users may end up wanting to unreview it
for a while then.
2) I don't know what you must be referring to by "the creation of new
versions by trusted users in the case that the current version is sighted.
Then, diffs are not needed for reviewing." Are you referring to a trusted
user editing a page that is already sighted? Again, if they add a
template/image, you cannot just take the current version of those
templates/images and make them part of a sighted revision. If while I was
adding an image to a reviewed page, as a reviewer, the image was
vandalized, you'd end up with a bad stable version.
As for 1), some of the same problems apply as well.
-Aaron Schulz
From: "P. Birken" <pbirken(a)gmail.com>
Reply-To: Wikimedia Quality Discussions <wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
To: "Wikimedia Quality Discussions" <wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [Wikiquality-l] Issues with FlaggedRevs
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:54:32 +0200
2007/8/15, Aaron Schulz <jschulz_4587(a)msn.com>om>:
What you cannot do is just have a diff shown on
edit and have it review
*and* save at the same time. As long is the review is done after the
save,
it's fine.
OK, but that's not a problem. The setting Erik and I are talking about
are twofold, namely the creation of new articles by trusted users and
the creation of new versions by trusted users in the case that the
current version is sighted. Then, diffs are not needed for reviewing.
Bye,
Philipp
_______________________________________________
Wikiquality-l mailing list
Wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
_________________________________________________________________
Learn.Laugh.Share. Reallivemoms is right place!
http://www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us