I'm just testing the latest FlaggedRevs code to see what kind of
configurations we should set up for Wikimedia. Thanks to Aaron for
continuing to work on it. FYI, we'll have a face-to-face meeting in
the Wikimedia office next week with Brion, myself, Philipp Birken &
Luca de Alfaro (Aaron can't make it) to discuss some of the open
issues.
From what I can tell, the current code will still show
a link to the
sighted version, even if current & sighted are fully identical. I
consider this highly confusing behavior, and I don't really see that
we can go live with this, even as an experiment.
Is there any option regulating this behavior, or another way around it?
If not: I would really like us to figure out a solution to this. I do
believe the situation where a page is current and sighted (and where
any included templates are unmodified from the sighted state, or have
been edited by trusted users & auto-reviewed), will be quite common,
because this is after all the situation we're trying to optimize
towards. A UI that makes a fully reviewed version look unreviewed
seems like a major problem to me.
--
Erik Möller
Deputy Director, Wikimedia Foundation
Support Free Knowledge:
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate