2007/8/14, Aaron Schulz <jschulz_4587(a)msn.com>om>:
2) This is complicated. You cannot review revision
without knowing the
templates/images used in it, which even with the page in edit mode and a
diff is not enough. Just parsing it and pulling it from there can review
vandalism to templates/images. Doesn't seem that bad to have to review after
editing, since when you edit a page, it refreshes back to the page, which
has the tag and diff link to the last reviewed version. This is for the
default UI...indeed the other one is more annoying about this. Perhaps the
simply UI should be for anons only?
Mhmh, that doesn't sound good. However, I do not get the technical
problem: instead of requiring the user to save the page and then
review the change manually, shouldn't it be possible to simply perform
a specific review automatically after saving the page?
Regarding the templates: the version of templates that is shown when
editing is hardwired to the version I review, right? If that is so,
then assuming that the editor has looked at the templates and
therefore performing the review automatically seems reasonable.
Bye,
Philipp