I also heartily support this. In particular inexperienced users often
need several edits to make their intended contribution. If the
software factually prevents them doing so, then we are raising the bar
too high. And I also think that this ranks higher than a possible
disincentive to vandals.
Bye,
Philipp
2007/10/10, David Goodman <dgoodmanny(a)gmail.com>om>:
A good suggestion. I don't see how anons would
have much incentive to
edit usefully otherwise.
On 10/9/07, R. S. Shaw <shaww(a)inbox.com> wrote:
Aaron Schulz wrote:
I may be able to use a similar hook call like a
function in flaggedrevs now to make it so that when a user edits a page where the stable
is the default, it redirects them to the page with the stable=0 url, so that they can see
their edits, rather than the stable version.
Yes, it seems fairly important that when an anon "edit draft"'s a page
which has Default:Stable that after Submit he is directed to the current version (which he
just created). This is (1) less confusing since he expects to see the change he just
made, (2) useful since he may look over what he did and see it needs expansion or
correction.
_______________________________________________
Wikiquality-l mailing list
Wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
_______________________________________________
Wikiquality-l mailing list
Wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l