I was about to respond, but first I edited the
candidates page to help out a bit, with exactly the answers you've now asked here in
email :) And we were evidently thinking along exactly the same lines!
I was going to say that indeed, you should go. You've been an obvious choice for the
previous two years, and I'm delighted you've fully committed to it this year!
Given discussion over recent days, and Without objection, it is decided from my
perspective.
Neal McBurnett
Thanks! Since nobody else volunteered, are we in
agreement I should go, then?
The following two questions are from the registration form, intended to help the
organisers determine the summit program:
1. How does your affiliate work support the Strategic Direction? How does the Strategic
Direction support your affiliate work?
2. What movement structures need to change to support you do your work better? What
structures help you? What structures hinder
you?
Given that they are about the user group as a whole, the answers should likewise probably
reflect the user group as a whole, not
just my own take on them (especially as my own take is largely just 'I don't
really know'). Does anyone have any thoughts on these?
-I
On 14/12/2018 16:10, Lee Pennebaker wrote:
My vote is with Isarra! I have considered putting my name in for the running, but I
think Isarra would be a much better
option.
Happy Friday, all!
Best wishes,
Lee
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 8:48 AM Isarra Yos <zhorishna(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hey, all, this weekend is the last before the deadline (17th midnight, CET). So
far I'm still the only one who's added
myself as a potential delegate on the page, so if you're interested in
going, please add yourself today and we can have a
vote/argument tomorrow (saturday), or something. As long as you put in something
better than my filler text, you're
probably good. (Yes, I do intend to fix that today as well, but hopefully
you've all already seen how bad it is by now.)
Thanks!
-I
On 28/11/2018 17:57, Isarra Yos wrote:
All right, I've created
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedians_of_Colorado_User_Group/wmsummit…
Please add yourself! I just put in a very basic filler text example for
myself, but that should... help kick things
off, or stuff. I'll add more later when I'm not rushing out the
door.
-I
On 27/11/2018 23:07, Lee Pennebaker wrote:
Hey all,
Relatively new member here. I've been reading these emails for a
while now - I'm pretty excited to be a part
of this group.
I'd love to throw my hat in the ring for consideration of the
summit. Please don't get me wrong - I don't mean to
disrespect the traditions here in terms of preferring the seniority of
delegates. This just seems like an
unbelievable opportunity, and I would be honored to be considered in
representing this group. I'm more than willing
to learn more about this organization and complete the application
process y'all decide on! And I completely
understand if I am coming too far out of left field to be considered!
Best wishes and much respect,
Lee Pennebaker
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 1:44 PM Neal McBurnett
<neal(a)bcn.boulder.co.us> wrote:
Well, Isarra hasn't gone yet....
Though we may want to follow our pretty-good tradition of asking
people to volunteer by posting a pitch
like we did at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedians_of_Colorado_User_Group/wmcon-20…
-Neal
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 03:17:56PM -0500, Gaurav Vaidya wrote:
On Nov 26 2018, at 6:38 pm, Isarra Yos <zhorishna(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The summit, as it is now called, is apparently in March again, and according to the
eligibility page, we
can send a person! (Is
this why we submit our reports? It is,
isn't it.)
Do we have a plan? Who do we want to send this time? What do we want to do with it?
Do we have any sort
of stance on anything
about the movement strategy in general, as
that seems to be the main focus? Deadline for the who to send
decision and whatnot
is 17 december, though, so maybe we can break
tradition and figure this out before the week of this time.
You can't just reject tradition like that. These things are such important parts of
who we are.
Seriously, though, are we at the point where all major WM-US-CO contributors have been
sent to Berlin? If
there's a contributor who
/wiki/
Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Day -- I'm going to try
and do something in Gainesville FL as well.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-US-CO mailing list
Wikimedia-US-CO(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-us-co
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-US-CO mailing list
Wikimedia-US-CO(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-us-co
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-US-CO mailing list
Wikimedia-US-CO(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-us-co
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-US-CO mailing list
Wikimedia-US-CO(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-us-co
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-US-CO mailing list
Wikimedia-US-CO(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-us-co
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-US-CO mailing list
Wikimedia-US-CO(a)lists.wikimedia.org