Hello,
In general I am against a toolserver wiki because we will be spreading
content further. Using meta makes more sense because that avoids
having information more and more decentralised, and there really is no
advantage to having its own wiki - the toolserver doesn't have that
much on it.
Meta is designed for things like this, and I don't see why we can't
have a toolserver category and fill it with pages.
Sean
On 18/10/2007, River Tarnell <river(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
hello,
1: JIRA and FishEye have moved to:
- <https://jira.ts.wikimedia.org/>
- <https://fisheye.ts.wikimedia.org/>
2: as an experiment i've set up a Confluence install at
<http://confluence.ts.wikimedia.org> (SSL also available). i don't know if
anyone's interested in using this for their content... it has a few nice
features.
i've also thought about setting up a MediaWiki. we already have content on
meta, but maybe people would like a dedicated space with a familiar wiki
instead. comments?
- river.
_______________________________________________
Toolserver-l mailing list
Toolserver-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l