Hello,
In general I am against a toolserver wiki because we will be spreading content further. Using meta makes more sense because that avoids having information more and more decentralised, and there really is no advantage to having its own wiki - the toolserver doesn't have that much on it.
Meta is designed for things like this, and I don't see why we can't have a toolserver category and fill it with pages.
Sean
On 18/10/2007, River Tarnell river@wikimedia.org wrote:
hello,
1: JIRA and FishEye have moved to:
2: as an experiment i've set up a Confluence install at http://confluence.ts.wikimedia.org (SSL also available). i don't know if anyone's interested in using this for their content... it has a few nice features.
i've also thought about setting up a MediaWiki. we already have content on meta, but maybe people would like a dedicated space with a familiar wiki instead. comments?
- river.
Toolserver-l mailing list Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l