-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10-02-04 12:24 PM, River Tarnell wrote:
Many (most?) tools have no
copyright header or license, which makes it difficult to distribute them.
There have been some proposals in the past, like assuming tools without
licenses will use a particular license, but I'm not too fond of that.
We could require that users freely license their code - then you would
know at least that the four freedoms apply and redistributing it
wouldn't be so hairy. But of course, one is supposed to know precisely
/which/ free license is used...
- -Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAktrFhIACgkQst0AR/DaKHv51QCgj/jTokhSPItI3ho7+uj6arU/
fRkAoNQFPbsgbczwGs2OlwEZHfqWSn97
=ZA+Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----