Like them both (and good article!) only quibble for the Twitter one would
be perhaps a 'how' at the start? ("How volunteer editors work..." ) not
necessary but sounds a bit better in my head.
For the facebook one I like the added depth but kinda like the draw from
the twitter post? Maybe combine the two? "How volunteer editors work to
educate the public on the Zika virus as it spreads throughout the Americas.
We spot to two editors who've made around 200 combined edits to the English
Wikipedia article on the outbreak." ?
James Alexander
Manager
Trust & Safety
Wikimedia Foundation
(415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
Hey all, here is some proposed social for the
newly-published post on the
Zika virus:
http://blog.wikimedia.org/2016/03/11/volunteers-zika-virus/
Twitter:
• Volunteer editors work to educate the public on the Zika virus as it
spreads throughout the Americas.
http://blog.wikimedia.org/2016/03/11/volunteers-zika-virus/
Facebook:
• We spoke to two editors who've made around 200 edits between them to the
English Wikipedia's article on the outbreak.
http://blog.wikimedia.org/2016/03/11/volunteers-zika-virus/
best,
Joe
--
*Joe Sutherland*
Communications Fellow [remote]
joesutherland.rocks | @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | +44 (0) 7722
916 433
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
Social-media(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media