I think we should keep both for the moment. Theo's text has more to do with a general definition of groups (that can be linked also with the roles matrix) than with new groups in particular, IMO.
Thanks Austin!
Best, galio
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Jon Huggett jon.huggett@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Austin
Great to see this. Is this page on 'New groups' meant to replace the page 'groups' [4] or should we keep both?
Cheers
Jon
[4] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles/groups
*Jon Huggett* +44-795-278-0688 +1-415-465-2700 jon@huggett.com *www.huggett.com* Skype jon.huggett
On Mar 5, 2011, at 10:56 , Austin Hair wrote:
Hi guys,
As agreed at yesterday's meeting[0], I moved the "new groups" text[1] to meta yesterday, and this morning finished summarizing the questions brought up in the previous thread[2]. Several people also made some rather insightful comments in that thread, and I think they deserve re-stating, but I'm not going to try to put words in people's mouths—particularly words said on a private list.
Would everyone please take a look at [1] and add your thoughts?
Austin
[0] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project/Working_group_meeting_... [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project/New_groups [2] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_roles_project/New_groups#Questions
Movementroles mailing list Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles
Movementroles mailing list Movementroles@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/movementroles