Since our current Squid stats [1] don't look very accurate or precise, I decided to generate something myself based on the logs we have. I analyzed a week's worth of logs, from 2013-06-10 to 2013-06-16. I generated three sets of data:
* minor: browsers grouped by their minor version, e.g. all Androids 4.2 go together, all Safaris 5.1, etc. * major: browsers grouped by their major version, e.g. all Androids 4 go together, all Safaris 5, etc. * vendor: browsers grouped by their name only, e.g. all Androids go together, all Safaris, etc.
Each group has also an additional file with all the unknown user agents logged (they are logged as "Other" in the main files). Everything is available here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/840ftlrfygtou4m/browser-stats-mobile-20130610-2013...
Most of it looks like I expected, the market is shared mostly among mobile Safari and Android. What I hadn't expected is that Android 2.3 is still the most popular Android at 9.79%. That's a lot. I started thinking what we could do about this. After some googling I found lots of Android 2.x users frustrated by the fact that Chrome is not available for Android older than 4 and they're stuck with a crappy browser.
I tried looking for an alternative and I found it rather quickly: Firefox. Mobile Firefox is a sad 0.26% of our users, even less than desktop Firefox (0.29%)! I tried installing it on the first Google Nexus and hey, maybe it's not superfast, but it's better than the stock Android 2.3 browser and supports both photo uploading and our new editor really well (stock Android 2.3 doesn't support uploads and the editor is... quite wonky). So, my suggestion is: let's show a banner or a call to action for Android 2.x users telling them about this and encouraging them to try Firefox. It's free open software and I think it's better than what stock Android 2.x browser is. What do you think? Wikimedia Foundation <3 Mozilla Foundation? ;)
Unrecognized browsers are mostly bots with one notable exception, NativeHost, which is probably the Windows Phone app (I'm guessing [2]).
[1] http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/squids/SquidReportClients.htm [2] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13306090/how-do-i-change-the-nativehost-s...
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Juliusz Gonera jgonera@wikimedia.org wrote:
Since our current Squid stats [1] don't look very accurate or precise,
Tell me a little more about where they break down.
--tomasz
We brought this up in the annual review and Toby and I flagged two stories which will automate this and device breakdowns.
https://mingle.corp.wikimedia.org/projects/analytics/cards/1227
https://mingle.corp.wikimedia.org/projects/analytics/cards/1228
Take a spin through both and modify as needed. I want us to not have to melt our laptops to get at this data.
--tomasz
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Juliusz Gonera jgonera@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 07/24/2013 02:24 PM, Tomasz Finc wrote:
Tell me a little more about where they break down. --tomasz
As an example all iPhones are in one bag, be it Safari 3 or Safari 7.
-- Juliusz
Thanks Tomasz -- for reference, we're using this wiki page to track the mobile data requests.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Analytics/Epics/Metrics_about_Mobile_Usage
Feedback on the report formats/contents would be great. We're reasonably close to getting the data feeds in place.
thanks,
-Toby
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Tomasz Finc tfinc@wikimedia.org wrote:
We brought this up in the annual review and Toby and I flagged two stories which will automate this and device breakdowns.
https://mingle.corp.wikimedia.org/projects/analytics/cards/1227
https://mingle.corp.wikimedia.org/projects/analytics/cards/1228
Take a spin through both and modify as needed. I want us to not have to melt our laptops to get at this data.
--tomasz
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Juliusz Gonera jgonera@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 07/24/2013 02:24 PM, Tomasz Finc wrote:
Tell me a little more about where they break down. --tomasz
As an example all iPhones are in one bag, be it Safari 3 or Safari 7.
-- Juliusz
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Toby Negrin tnegrin@wikimedia.org wrote:
Feedback on the report formats/contents would be great. We're reasonably close to getting the data feeds in place.
I made my edits in the cards. If you need edits elsewhere then do let know. I just want to make sure to keep everything in one place to minimize confusion.
Cards are fine -- the wiki doc just tries to pull it all together.
thanks,
-Toby
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Tomasz Finc tfinc@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Toby Negrin tnegrin@wikimedia.org wrote:
Feedback on the report formats/contents would be great. We're reasonably close to getting the data feeds in place.
I made my edits in the cards. If you need edits elsewhere then do let know. I just want to make sure to keep everything in one place to minimize confusion.