I would strongly recommend NOT to import automatic descriptions as manual descriptions into Wikidata. Automatic descriptions change when the data changes, new data is added, or the algorithm improves. I would prefer manual descriptions done by humans, for the comparatively small number of items that are hard to auto-describe, and use (properly cached) automated descriptions for everything else.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 6:36 PM Jon Robson jdlrobson@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 Mar 2015 09:13, "Magnus Manske" magnusmanske@googlemail.com wrote:
May I use this as a shameless plug for my automatic description API: http://magnusmanske.de/wordpress/?p=265
It scores a 9 in the Hemmingway app for Nietzsche, as opposed to the 22
for the English Wikipedia initial paragraph:
Thanks Magnus Was hoping this would be the case and you would confirm that :-)
I personally would be very keen to get this into Wikidata via a bot. What are the blockers for doing that? What has the discussion been around that so far?
https://tools.wmflabs.org/autodesc/?q=Q9358&lang=&mode=long&link...
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 8:38 AM Federico Leva (Nemo) nemowiki@gmail.com
wrote:
What's the scientific background of hemingwayapp? I don't see anything on their website. There is no one-size-fits-all readability algo for English, as far as I know.
Nemo
Mobile-l mailing list Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
Mobile-l mailing list Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l