As far as i can see, the API does not answer the bounce question.
Please, does some one know if bounce is included in the numbers? Thanks, regards, hansmuller
Op Ma, 18 januari, 2016 2:31 pm schreef Maarten Brinkerink:
https://twitter.com/MagnusManske/status/686886792545615874 https://twitter.com/MagnusManske/status/686886792545615874
Op 18 jan. 2016, om 14:28 heeft Lizzy Jongma L.Jongma@rijksmuseum.nl het volgende geschreven:
Dear all,
I noticed that Baglama 2 mentioned a new service: an API. I am under the impression that the API is going to replace the current service. Does anyone know wether this is true? I tried to work with the API but I am not a JSON expert and so far got no understandable dataâ¦. Best wishes Lizzy Jongma, Rijksmuseum
On 18 Jan 2016, at 14:21, Hans Muller j.m.muller@hccnet.nl wrote:
Dear all,
Magnus' tool BaGLAMa 2 (detailed Pageview analysis) is extremely valuable to track interest for GLAM donations, and to convince GLAMs how useful their donation is or could be.
One question remains:
- Is the bounce (click and immediately/quickly gone) component
included/excluded in the number of pageviews?
I always thought that bounce was included because it is much harder to exclude it, so i used the numbers with a caveat and only relatively to each other, but then perhaps the tool tacitly assumes that a pageview only counts when the dwell time exceeds say ...?? sec?
With Google analytics on other websites one finds that the bounce component routinely is of the order of 30%, so perhaps for wikimedia sites the same amount holds.
Perhaps someone knows, thanks and best regards,
User:Hansmuller https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hansmuller
PS Example: https://tools.wmflabs.org/glamtools/baglama2/#gid=205&month=201512
with many pageviews thanks to the often-clicked article Mumbai
Glamtools mailing list Glamtools@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools
Glamtools mailing list Glamtools@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glamtools