I am at the final test run stage of a Rijksmuseum upload and getting annoying results when using the Artwork template in GWT, compared to my experience when using the Information template.
FILENAME The filename used appears based on <title> + <title identifier> + {mime-type}. This is incredibly annoying as I would like to be able to specify the filename for myself as this formula means that I cannot identify the language on the Artwork title parameter (such as using {{nl | 1=<title>}} as this puts leading junk in the filename) and gives the uploader no control over specifying the extention (i.e. forcing "jpeg" instead of using the community norm of "jpg").
Are there reasons for this approach, or is this suitable to be improved?
HTML TRANSLATION A second trap is that the wikicode use of " ' " is rendered impossible as it is translated as "'". Similarly "<br>" vanishes. This makes formatting of text inside the Artwork template extremely limited and is not the approach used for the Information template. There could be some underpinning rationale due to the differences in these templates, but the behaviour appears quite inconsistent to me.
Fae