On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 3:07 PM, James Heald j.heald@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
While you're running the clean-up script to fix all the apostrophes, you might also prefer the neater (and warning-free) {{PD-old-70-1923}} rather than {{PD-US}}{{PD-old}} -- though in fact, for these images of 3D objects, the license needed is surely {{Cc-zero}} or something similar, because there needs to be some release of the photographer's copyright.
Seconded here. Surely the objects are PD, but the photographs are definitely not, so you probably want to add the CC-zero template as well. It's a bit of a shame that the metadata isn't very clear on the license, but for now i guess just checking if the 'copyrightHolder' field is null or false is the best way forward. I did a little check and copyrighted works have a string in that field *and* the 'webImage' field is false (where PD works have an object there with image information).
Are you in contact with people from the Rijksmuseum by the way? If you want i could introduce you so they could have a look at the sample upload as well.
And thanks so much for the project page describing the upload progress, i'll be adding those for the National Library / Archive uploads as well.
-- Hay