I just looked at the reports—and specifically at the suggestions it makes
on code I'm familiar with—and while I'm not sure all of the issues warrant
fixing, a lot of them are obviously valid improvements. It's also good to
have code coverage reports for our plugins.
So, it probably had the effect you desired, in that I now want to write
some more tests.
Trey Jones
Sr. Software Engineer, Search Platform
Wikimedia Foundation
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:37 AM Guillaume Lederrey <glederrey(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
Hello!
I took some time to upload a first analysis of our Java based projects
to SonarCloud [1]. This is just experimentation at this point, but
there are a few interesting findings that should be corrected.
What's missing:
* run the analysis regularly, so that we can see trends
* host it on our own infrastructure instead of depending on SonarCloud
* some discussion on whether we agree with the metrics / issues
* lot more
Have fun!
Guillaume
[1]
https://sonarcloud.io/organizations/wmftest/projects
--
Guillaume Lederrey
Operations Engineer, Search Platform
Wikimedia Foundation
UTC+2 / CEST
_______________________________________________
Discovery mailing list
Discovery(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/discovery