I just looked at the reports—and specifically at the suggestions it makes on code I'm familiar with—and while I'm not sure all of the issues warrant fixing, a lot of them are obviously valid improvements. It's also good to have code coverage reports for our plugins.

So, it probably had the effect you desired, in that I now want to write some more tests.

Trey Jones
Sr. Software Engineer, Search Platform
Wikimedia Foundation


On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:37 AM Guillaume Lederrey <glederrey@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hello!

I took some time to upload a first analysis of our Java based projects
to SonarCloud [1]. This is just experimentation at this point, but
there are a few interesting findings that should be corrected.

What's missing:
* run the analysis regularly, so that we can see trends
* host it on our own infrastructure instead of depending on SonarCloud
* some discussion on whether we agree with the metrics / issues
* lot more

Have fun!

   Guillaume


[1] https://sonarcloud.io/organizations/wmftest/projects

--
Guillaume Lederrey
Operations Engineer, Search Platform
Wikimedia Foundation
UTC+2 / CEST

_______________________________________________
Discovery mailing list
Discovery@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/discovery