I just looked at the reports—and specifically at the suggestions it makes on code I'm familiar with—and while I'm not sure all of the issues warrant fixing, a lot of them are obviously valid improvements. It's also good to have code coverage reports for our plugins.
So, it probably had the effect you desired, in that I now want to write some more tests.
Trey Jones Sr. Software Engineer, Search Platform Wikimedia Foundation
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:37 AM Guillaume Lederrey glederrey@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hello!
I took some time to upload a first analysis of our Java based projects to SonarCloud [1]. This is just experimentation at this point, but there are a few interesting findings that should be corrected.
What's missing:
- run the analysis regularly, so that we can see trends
- host it on our own infrastructure instead of depending on SonarCloud
- some discussion on whether we agree with the metrics / issues
- lot more
Have fun!
Guillaume
[1] https://sonarcloud.io/organizations/wmftest/projects
-- Guillaume Lederrey Operations Engineer, Search Platform Wikimedia Foundation UTC+2 / CEST
Discovery mailing list Discovery@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/discovery