On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Dario Taraborelli <
dtaraborelli(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
I second Aaron’s concerns, which I previously
expressed during the
consultation about the new privacy policy. My main objection to the
proposed solution is that by saying “Wikimedia honors DNT headers” we imply
– by the most popular/de facto interpretation of DNT – that we *do* 3rd
party tracking but we* allow* users to opt out, which puts WMF on par
with aggressive tracking practices adopted by most sites.
But we wouldn't say that; that would be silly.
We'd make it completely
clear that we are making use of the header that we think
>is consistent
with the expectation of users but which departs from the standard in a
significant way.
+1 to Leila and Ori I do not think this is as issue that cannot be solved
with a simple FAQ.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Leila Zia <leila(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Ori Livneh <ori(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Dario Taraborelli <
dtaraborelli(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
I second Aaron’s concerns, which I previously
expressed during the
consultation about the new privacy policy. My main objection to the
proposed solution is that by saying “Wikimedia honors DNT headers” we imply
– by the most popular/de facto interpretation of DNT – that we *do* 3rd
party tracking but we* allow* users to opt out, which puts WMF on par
with aggressive tracking practices adopted by most sites.
But we wouldn't say that; that would be silly. We'd make it completely
clear that we are making use of the header that we think is consistent with
the expectation of users but which departs from the standard in a
significant way.
I, too, agree that this is something we (Comms) can handle through proper
communications. It's not a big concern for me.
Leila
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics