On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemowiki@gmail.com wrote:
Federico Leva (Nemo), 26/05/2014 10:38:
Why would someone import {{babel}} when {{#babel}} works out of the box with same syntax? Not that any wikis are being created anyway.
I did some silly bzgrep -c and the usage of {{#babel}} is significant on most wikis; to have the total you should count how many {{babel}} are just (correct) wrappers of {{#babel}}. Not only on several huge wikis #babel is more used, but even where it's less used it usually grows more than the old template from one dump to the next (even on en.wiki new usages are comparable). http://koti.kapsi.fi/~federico/babel.csv
Thank you!
So, the wikis with the largest non-#babel usage are enwiki, dewiki, plwiki and itwiki. Upgrading the usage on them to #babel should establish a good dataset to work with.
Since you have the dumps there, any chance you could find which templates use #babel on enwiki, dewiki, plwiki and itwiki. The search interface doesnt report them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&profile=adva...
Here is the status of {{Babel}} on the wikis with the largest usage of {{#babel}}.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Babel - deprecated https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Babel - deprecated https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Babel - deprecated
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Template:Babel - 'do not use'
https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Babel - deleted https://is.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Babel - deleted https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Template:Babel - deleted
{{Babel}} is a wrapper for #babel: eswiki and cswiki