On May 25, 2014 5:24 PM, "Oliver Keyes" <okeyes(a)wikimedia.org> wrote: Those that look problematic: are incredibly inconsistent between projects, How many wikis have the Babel extension implemented? -- John

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki(a)gmail.com> wrote: It looks like it isnt implemented on English Wikipedia...? Can we see how many wikis have 'fully' implemented it? i.e. all non-deprecated templates use it, and most user-pages have been migrated if necessary. There are quite a few bugs in it which might be preventing adoption, such as auto-recreating deleted categories which tends to annoy admins. -- John Vandenberg

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki(a)gmail.com> wrote: ;-) This type of implementation (template changes; userboxes) change tends to, if done on en.wp, trickle from English Wikipedia to most of the Wikipedias outside the top ~20. Copying templates from en.wp is [[Claytons]] scary transclusion. -- John Vandenberg

Federico Leva (Nemo), 26/05/2014 10:38: I did some silly bzgrep -c and the usage of {{#babel}} is significant on most wikis; to have the total you should count how many {{babel}} are just (correct) wrappers of {{#babel}}. Not only on several huge wikis #babel is more used, but even where it's less used it usually grows more than the old template from one dump to the next (even on en.wiki new usages are comparable). http://koti.kapsi.fi/~federico/babel.csv Nemo

Hmm, assuming you can find the connection between mailing list name and editor name. Both are public but often not the same. From: Erik Zachte [mailto:ezachte@wikimedia.org] Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2014 17:01 To: 'A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an interest in Wikipedia and analytics.' Subject: RE: [Analytics] Cohort analysis * A list of public mailing lists where members have contributed in the past 12 months You could start to build from the script used for http://www.infodisiac.com/Wikipedia/ScanMail/_PowerPosters.html Cheers, Erik From: analytics-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:analytics-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of ENWP Pine Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2014 9:16 To: analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Analytics] Cohort analysis Hi Analytics, I'm looking for a way to do a cohort analysis for a presentation that I'm drafting. I want a report that shows: * A list of languages showing the users who speak each language as identified on their user pages * A list of projects where users have made at least 5 edits in the past 12 months * A list of group members that have administrator rights and which wikis are involved * A list of public mailing lists where members have contributed in the past 12 months * Number of public emails on those mailing lists in the past 12 months * Total edits made by the cohort * Total bytes changed by the cohort * Total logged-in time for the cohort, if log-in time aggregation is being done What automated tools could I use to create this report? Are there any significant editor productivity metrics that are missing from this list? Thanks, Pine