Re: [Analytics] Records of article access

Thanks Toby. I understand that IPs are not an especially accurate way to look at unique visitors, but for the purposes of the Signpost's traffic report and the Top 25 I feel that they are reasonable approximations of ways to filter out what appear to be automated requests. I am ok with holding those logs for 30 days, although I am a little surprised to hear that this is happening. However, what worries me a bit more is the idea that a staff member can be accessing those logs without that access being recorded. This might be something that you wish to investigate further. I am not interested in getting this staff person into trouble. The information that they are providing is useful to the Signpost and certainly seems to be sanitized to a reasonable degree. However, it does concern me that they can access these logs without someone knowing about it, it seems to me that this sort of activity should be proactively disclosed to people in WMF who conduct legal and security reviews, and I hope you will consider what sort of security features are appropriate to make sure that occasions when anyone accesses the raw logs are recorded in a robust manner. I worry that if this one staffer can access logs without the higher-ups knowing about it, it is possible that someone who intends to do unethical activities with WMF's data could also access the logs without being noticed. Thanks, Pine On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Toby Negrin <tnegrin(a)wikimedia.org> wrote: > Hi Pine -- > > Thanks for this -- it's a challenging topic but one that the Analytics > team takes very seriously. > > I'm not familiar with the IP address review that's referenced in the > link. I don't know who the staffer might be. We don't currently calculate > unique visitors to anything in Analytics and IP address is not a > particularly accurate way to assess unique visitors regardless (due to > proxies/NATs/etc). > > We do store IPs as part of page requests in our raw logs which are > deleted every 30 days. This data is kept on a system where access is > limited and controlled by the operations team. We're in line with the > privacy policy on this. > > To be clear, we are currently considering mechanisms to count unique > "requests" -- we rely on Comscore for this data and for several reasons, > primarily related to mobile usage, it's not sufficient to understand our > usage patterns. We are putting together some proposals to do this in as > limited way as possible and that's respectful to our users. We'll share > this with the community when we feel we understand the use cases and > trade-offs well enough to discuss in an informed manner. > > -Toby > > > > We do store the IP address associated with varnish requests as part of > the log. This data is > > > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Pine W <wiki.pine(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi again Analytics, >> >> I was under the impression that no records are kept of which IPs >> access which articles on Wikipedia when no edits are made, but it appears >> that such records are in fact kept [1]. >> >> Is this proper? This practice appears to be permissible under the >> Privacy Policy which states that "We use IP addresses for research and >> analytics; to better personalize content, notices, and settings for you; to >> fight spam, identity theft, malware, and other kinds of abuse; and to >> provide better mobile and other applications." >> >> It is possible that this information is relevant for determining the >> number of unique visitors that Wikipedia gets and that this information is >> always properly filtered before it gets to the Signpost. However, given >> recent discussions which I thought said that Wikipedia was not instrumented >> to track unique visitors, I am surprised to learn that this already seems >> to be happening and that the situation has been this way for some time, so >> I would appreciate clarification. >> >> I want to emphasize that this question is about clarifying the >> practice of tracking likely unique visitors by IP. This question is not >> intended to start flame wars, get people into trouble, or limit the >> Signpost's access to properly filtered information if there has been a >> determination that WMF's retention of the raw data is appropriate. There >> might be appropriate secondary questions about making sure that access to >> the raw IP access data is carefully contained and secured. >> >> Thank you very much, >> >> Pine >> >> [1] >> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASerendipodous&di… >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Analytics mailing list >> Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > > _______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics