Furthering that initial metrics work, Aaron did some more research and came
up with a set of standard metrics:
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Jonathan Morgan <jmorgan(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
Hi Jan,
A few years ago, the Grants (now Community Engagement) dept. at WMF put
together a set of metrics
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Learning_patterns/Calculating_global_metrics>
designed to measure the impact of different kinds of grant-funded and/or
"programmatic" events and activities within the movement. Many of these
metrics were built into the Wikimetrics tool
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Evaluation/Wikimetrics>,
developed by the Analytics team to help individuals and groups measure and
report the impact of their activities themselves.
The metrics we developed aren't perfect, but they were based on research
and intended to be accessible and provide coverage for a wide variety of
activities related to the Wikimedia movement. So they represent a framework
in that respect. To learn more about them, you might ask members of the
Learning & Evaluation team
<https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Staff_and_contractors#Learning_.26_Evaluation>
.
- J
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Jan Dittrich <jan.dittrich(a)wikimedia.de>
wrote:
Hello Analytics,
It seems to easily happen that a well meant metrics is proposed, but that
this is actually not sure to be correlated with something value or (at
least with my skills) super hard to measure technically [1].
So I wanted to create some easy-to-graspmaterials, maybe to put them on a
poster or in a video… whatever.
Sadly I found a lot of warnings about "vanity metrics" online
(recommending $ made instead) but no framework, research or case studies on
organizational impact and understanding of metrics and how colleagues can
be helped to be empowered to do a basic evaluation of metrics.
*So you have any framework, research or case studies that could help us
to teach and empower to evaluate** metrics and their use?*
Here is what I found useful so far:
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DIKW_pyramid and similar frameworks like
https://randomblatherdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/bmus
t7rcuaa6ueo-jpg-large.jpeg
- For the need of organizational sensemaking: Weick, Sensemaking in
Organizations
- And, not directly related but providing some inspiration: Robust
methods and visualizations by Tuckey, decision making under uncertainty by
Gingerenzer.
Jan
[1] In which case I prefer no metric at all, and investing into
qualitative research instead, till the problem space is better understood,
but if metrics are already there it often stays…
--
Jan Dittrich
UX Design/ User Research
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin
Phone: +49 (0)30 219 158 26-0
http://wikimedia.de
Imagine a world, in which every single human being can freely share in
the sum of all knowledge. That‘s our commitment.
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter
der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für
Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/029/42207.
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
--
Jonathan T. Morgan
Senior Design Researcher
Wikimedia Foundation
User:Jmorgan (WMF) <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jmorgan_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics