We could blacklist this schema from the mysql database, and still keep producing it. It
would be available in Hadoop either way.
On Dec 15, 2015, at 12:22, Jonathan Morgan
<jmorgan(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hi Nuria,
FWIW: Although I'm not using this right now, but I could see it being useful for
understanding the impact of new notification updates that are coming down the pike.[1][2]
What are the costs involved in keeping this schema up?
Best,
J
1.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Cross-wiki_notifications_user_rese…
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Cross-wiki_notifications_user_research>
2.
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T116741
<https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T116741>
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Nuria Ruiz <nuria(a)wikimedia.org
<mailto:nuria@wikimedia.org>> wrote:
Roan:
The data for Echo
schema(https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Schema:Echo
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Schema:Echo>) is quite large and we are not sure is
even used.
Can you confirm either way? If it is no longer used we will stop collecting it.
Thanks,
Nuria
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics>
--
Jonathan T. Morgan
Senior Design Researcher
Wikimedia Foundation
User:Jmorgan (WMF) <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jmorgan_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics