Indeed, but next step != explicit deliverables. Kevin, could you put together a meeting to work out what's specifically being asked for here? Then Dan can prioritise and schedule it as part of the standard process.
On 27 May 2015 at 17:04, Tomasz Finc tfinc@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Oliver Keyes okeyes@wikimedia.org wrote:
I'm sort of shocked to hear "we're supposed to be presenting this data at the next metrics meeting": in the future if there are instances where data is going to be up for public scrutiny, would it be possible to explicitly associate time for that? My goal is to get us to the point where our data is reliable all, or at least, most of the time, and for a fragment of one person's time over two weeks, I think progress on that is pretty fantastic. But prepping data for that kind of event does change the priorities and what tasks should be worked on.
If we want to present data, generally speaking, let's discuss what we can show off. If we want to present the dashboards I'll put my all into making the data at least something where we know the deficiencies, if not something where we consider the deficiencies tolerable.
This was brought up as a next step during a number of discussions between the team before I left. Let's focus on what it would take and work with the team to do it. I don't want to present data we have no confidence in but we need to start showcasing the stories that were learning and pushing search forward for our users.
Thank you for your work on this Oliver
--tomasz
Wikimedia-search-private mailing list Wikimedia-search-private@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-search-private