Indeed, but next step != explicit deliverables. Kevin, could you put
together a meeting to work out what's specifically being asked for
here? Then Dan can prioritise and schedule it as part of the standard
process.
On 27 May 2015 at 17:04, Tomasz Finc <tfinc(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Oliver Keyes
<okeyes(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
I'm sort of shocked to hear "we're
supposed to be presenting this data
at the next metrics meeting": in the future if there are instances
where data is going to be up for public scrutiny, would it be possible
to explicitly associate time for that? My goal is to get us to the
point where our data is reliable all, or at least, most of the time,
and for a fragment of one person's time over two weeks, I think
progress on that is pretty fantastic. But prepping data for that kind
of event does change the priorities and what tasks should be worked
on.
If we want to present data, generally speaking, let's discuss what we
can show off. If we want to present the dashboards I'll put my all
into making the data at least something where we know the
deficiencies, if not something where we consider the deficiencies
tolerable.
This was brought up as a next step during a number of discussions
between the team before I left. Let's focus on what it would take and
work with the team to do it. I don't want to present data we have no
confidence in but we need to start showcasing the stories that were
learning and pushing search forward for our users.
Thank you for your work on this Oliver
--tomasz
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-search-private mailing list
Wikimedia-search-private(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-search-private