The use of analytics staff resources is something that I take an interest in, and was expressing my qualified support for doing.
Pine
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Dan Garry dgarry@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 15 July 2014 22:58, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Just a note that I still disagree with WMF's response to this RFC, more for procedural and wikilegal reasons than analytic ones. I won't rehash that debate here, and could support having more statistics collected, but it seems to me that the principled thing to do is for WMF to respect the RfC process first and work on further analytics second. I wish people success in gathering analytics that the community could consider in a future RfC.
That discussion is very far outside the scope of this mailing list.
Dan
-- Dan Garry Associate Product Manager for Platform and Mobile Apps Wikimedia Foundation
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics