On 15 July 2014 22:58, Pine W <wiki.pine@gmail.com> wrote:

Just a note that I still disagree with WMF's response to this RFC, more for procedural and wikilegal reasons than analytic ones. I won't rehash that debate here, and could support having more statistics collected, but it seems to me that the principled thing to do is for WMF to respect the RfC process first and work on further analytics second. I wish people success in gathering analytics that the community could consider in a future RfC.

That discussion is very far outside the scope of this mailing list.

Dan

--

Dan Garry

Associate Product Manager for Platform and Mobile Apps

Wikimedia Foundation

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics