Is it feasible to archive the repositories in case we want to be able to see them in the future? For instance, if we want to get a snapshot of what a particular person was working on, or show off that we are experimental and iterative folks. :-) It does make sense to take them out of active dashboards and make them less discoverable.
Sumana Harihareswara Engineering Community Manager Wikimedia Foundation
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Diederik van Liere dvanliere@wikimedia.orgwrote:
Heya,
I would like to delete some of our Gerrit repo's that we don't use at all and just clutter up our projects. I propose to delete the following repo's:
- analytics/DeviceMapLogCapture (a shortlived experiment for device
recognition by Patrick Reilly, we are using OpenDDR now)
- analytics/debs/kafka-0.7.2 (this is an old test version of kafka, the
new repo lives under operations)
- analytics/dclass an old dclass repo with debian stuff, the new one lives
under operations
- analytics/graphkit - i think this is a precursor to Limn, the
description says "IGNORE THIS REPO"
- analytics/global-dev/sqproc - a small repo from evan, his work is all
available under github.com/embr
- analytics/global-dev/reportcard - message "IGNORE THIS REPO"
- analytics/reportcard/old-pipeline - a test in python to replace
wikistats, never got far.
- analytics/user-metrics-2 - not used AFAIK
- analytics/packages/thrift This repository has been abandoned in favor of
https://github.com/wmf-analytics/thrift-debian
- analytics/E3Analysis - the correct repo for UMAPI is
analytics/user-metrics
Please chime in if you disagree with any of the proposals. Once we have consensus I will ask Chad to delete them.
Best, Diederik
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics