Is it feasible to archive the repositories in case we want to be able to see them in the future? For instance, if we want to get a snapshot of what a particular person was working on, or show off that we are experimental and iterative folks. :-) It does make sense to take them out of active dashboards and make them less discoverable.

Sumana Harihareswara
Engineering Community Manager
Wikimedia Foundation

On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Diederik van Liere <dvanliere@wikimedia.org> wrote:

Heya,

I would like to delete some of our Gerrit repo's that we don't use at all and just clutter up our projects. I propose to delete the following repo's:

* analytics/DeviceMapLogCapture (a shortlived experiment for device recognition by Patrick Reilly, we are using OpenDDR now)
* analytics/debs/kafka-0.7.2 (this is an old test version of kafka, the new repo lives under operations)

* analytics/dclass an old dclass repo with debian stuff, the new one lives under operations
* analytics/graphkit - i think this is a precursor to Limn, the description says "IGNORE THIS REPO"

* analytics/global-dev/sqproc - a small repo from evan, his work is all available under github.com/embr
* analytics/global-dev/reportcard - message "IGNORE THIS REPO"

* analytics/reportcard/old-pipeline - a test in python to replace wikistats, never got far.
* analytics/user-metrics-2 - not used AFAIK
* analytics/packages/thrift This repository has been abandoned in favor of https://github.com/wmf-analytics/thrift-debian

* analytics/E3Analysis - the correct repo for UMAPI is analytics/user-metrics

Please chime in if you disagree with any of the proposals. Once we have consensus I will ask Chad to delete them.

Best,
Diederik

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics