Gonna stop this ISO date fancy bandwagon right here :)
We could do it with a bunch of VCL code but that affects performance of the site and we'd rather take the hit in analytics. We could look into making a UDF that deals with this and other common date code we'd want to DRY.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Oliver Keyes okeyes@wikimedia.org wrote:
+1 for ISO dates. They're also more parsable by researchers.
On 27 April 2015 at 18:57, Dario Taraborelli dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org wrote:
I also noticed the cookie stores a string with a 3-letter month
(27-Apr-2015), any reason not to use a shorter ISO date instead (2015-04-27)?
On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Marcel Ruiz Forns mforns@wikimedia.org
wrote:
+1 'last' _______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
-- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics