Gonna stop this ISO date fancy bandwagon right here :)

We could do it with a bunch of VCL code but that affects performance of the site and we'd rather take the hit in analytics.  We could look into making a UDF that deals with this and other common date code we'd want to DRY.

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Oliver Keyes <okeyes@wikimedia.org> wrote:
+1 for ISO dates. They're also more parsable by researchers.

On 27 April 2015 at 18:57, Dario Taraborelli <dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> I also noticed the cookie stores a string with a 3-letter month (27-Apr-2015), any reason not to use a shorter ISO date instead (2015-04-27)?
>
>> On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Marcel Ruiz Forns <mforns@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>
>> +1 'last'
>> _______________________________________________
>> Analytics mailing list
>> Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Analytics mailing list
> Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics



--
Oliver Keyes
Research Analyst
Wikimedia Foundation

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics