You can also contact the tool maintainers on enwp10 to find out about how
they score it - the details are listed here -
.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Oliver Keyes <okeyes(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
I don't think I've ever seen that scoring tool
before; it's certainly not
run by WMF analytics. I would imagine it's producing that result because it
is going off the article quality, which hasn't been set for that content,
but that's basically idle speculation.
On 15 January 2016 at 01:31, Anders Neld <anders(a)neld.se> wrote:
Hi,
I would be grateful to know why the unassessed Wikipedia article *Emelie
Forsberg* hos a score of 0 when the grok statistics say that it has been
viewed in excess of 3,000 times in 90 days. Doesn't the hitcount data for
used for calculating the score use the same data?
With best regards,
--
Anders Neld
Sveavägen 59
SE-182 62 Djursholm
Sweden
anders(a)neld.se
Home: +46 8 755 74 25
Mobile: +46 70 66 66 120
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
--
Oliver Keyes
Count Logula
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
Analytics(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
