You can also contact the tool maintainers on enwp10 to find out about how they score it - the details are listed here - http://tools.wmflabs.org/.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Oliver Keyes okeyes@wikimedia.org wrote:
I don't think I've ever seen that scoring tool before; it's certainly not run by WMF analytics. I would imagine it's producing that result because it is going off the article quality, which hasn't been set for that content, but that's basically idle speculation.
On 15 January 2016 at 01:31, Anders Neld anders@neld.se wrote:
Hi,
I would be grateful to know why the unassessed Wikipedia article *Emelie Forsberg* hos a score of 0 when the grok statistics say that it has been viewed in excess of 3,000 times in 90 days. Doesn't the hitcount data for used for calculating the score use the same data?
With best regards,
Anders Neld Sveavägen 59 SE-182 62 Djursholm Sweden anders@neld.se Home: +46 8 755 74 25 Mobile: +46 70 66 66 120
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
-- Oliver Keyes Count Logula Wikimedia Foundation
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
