The fuck AI request, be transparent
On Nov 30, 2016 2:00 PM, ai-request@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
Send AI mailing list submissions to ai@lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ai or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ai-request@lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at ai-owner@lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of AI digest..."
Today's Topics:
- The Revision scoring weekly update (Aaron Halfaker)
Message: 1 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:34:11 -0500 From: Aaron Halfaker aaron.halfaker@gmail.com To: Application of Artificial Intelligence and other advanced computing strategies to Wikimedia Projects <ai@lists.wikimedia.org
,
Wikimedia developers <wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org>Subject: [AI] The Revision scoring weekly update Message-ID: <CANQe2T_GAqzZYraq7vm+WcSZi+x-1p7K_HP1PTvYgjEUY4_OrQ@mail. gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hey,
This is the 30th and 31st weekly update from the revision scoring team that we have sent to this mailing list. We accidentally skipped a week again.
*New development:*
- We added a new "lowest" sensitivity level to ORES review tool. This
new sensistivity level will only flag edits that ORES is very confident are actually damaging[1].
We applied the MediaWiki standard color palette to Wikilabels[2]
We generated a manually censored public dataset of
spam/vandalism/attack pages[3]. This will help others to develop spam, vandalism and attack page detection models. See the publication of the dataset[4].
- We've implement color-based confidence reporting for ORES damage
detection[5]
*Maintenance and robustness:*
- We updated the version of OOjs-UI that gets bundled with Wiki
labels[6] and moved the static assets to a new repositiory[7]
- We fixed an issue in the recscoring library[8] that caused ORES to
return invalid JSON and rendered the UI useless[9].
*Communications:*
- We gave a 3 minute presentation on the state of ORES to Victoria
Coleman, the WMF's new CTO[10].
- We performed a basic analysis of Wikipedia article quality trends
using the dataset we released a few weeks ago[11]. We'll have a more substantial analysis soon.
- We made a post on the ORES review tool talk page[12,13] detailing how
we plan to incorporate a new filtering strategy into the ORES review tool. Please join the discussion there.
- https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150224 -- Add "Lowest" ORES
sensitivity for fpr=0.1 2. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151119 -- Apply ui standardization color palette to Wikilabels 3. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150307 -- Create manually vetted dataset of spam/vandalism/attack pages 4. https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4245035 5. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T144922 -- Visually report damaging confidence 6. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151222 -- Update bundled OOJS-ui with Wikilabels 7. https://github.com/wiki-ai/flask-oojsui 8. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150961 -- ORES ui is broken (text field disabled) 9. https://github.com/wiki-ai/ores/issues/177 10. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150544 -- ORES (a 2-3 minute presentation) 11. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151214 -- Basic analysis of Wikipedia quality using monthly predictions 12. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150858 -- Post about ORES review tool including ERI filters 13. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Tflhjj5x1numzg67
Sincerely, Aaron from the Revision Scoring team
excuse me?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Ghassan Maslamani < ghassan.maslamani@gmail.com> wrote:
The fuck AI request, be transparent
On Nov 30, 2016 2:00 PM, ai-request@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
Send AI mailing list submissions to ai@lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ai or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ai-request@lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at ai-owner@lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of AI digest..."
Today's Topics:
- The Revision scoring weekly update (Aaron Halfaker)
Message: 1 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:34:11 -0500 From: Aaron Halfaker aaron.halfaker@gmail.com To: Application of Artificial Intelligence and other advanced computing strategies to Wikimedia Projects < ai@lists.wikimedia.org>, Wikimedia developers wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [AI] The Revision scoring weekly update Message-ID: <CANQe2T_GAqzZYraq7vm+WcSZi+x-1p7K_HP1PTvYgjEUY4_OrQ@mail.gm ail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hey,
This is the 30th and 31st weekly update from the revision scoring team that we have sent to this mailing list. We accidentally skipped a week again.
*New development:*
- We added a new "lowest" sensitivity level to ORES review tool. This
new sensistivity level will only flag edits that ORES is very confident are actually damaging[1].
We applied the MediaWiki standard color palette to Wikilabels[2]
We generated a manually censored public dataset of
spam/vandalism/attack pages[3]. This will help others to develop spam, vandalism and attack page detection models. See the publication of the dataset[4].
- We've implement color-based confidence reporting for ORES damage
detection[5]
*Maintenance and robustness:*
- We updated the version of OOjs-UI that gets bundled with Wiki
labels[6] and moved the static assets to a new repositiory[7]
- We fixed an issue in the recscoring library[8] that caused ORES to
return invalid JSON and rendered the UI useless[9].
*Communications:*
- We gave a 3 minute presentation on the state of ORES to Victoria
Coleman, the WMF's new CTO[10].
- We performed a basic analysis of Wikipedia article quality trends
using the dataset we released a few weeks ago[11]. We'll have a more substantial analysis soon.
- We made a post on the ORES review tool talk page[12,13] detailing how
we plan to incorporate a new filtering strategy into the ORES review tool. Please join the discussion there.
- https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150224 -- Add "Lowest" ORES
sensitivity for fpr=0.1 2. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151119 -- Apply ui standardization color palette to Wikilabels 3. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150307 -- Create manually vetted dataset of spam/vandalism/attack pages 4. https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4245035 5. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T144922 -- Visually report damaging confidence 6. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151222 -- Update bundled OOJS-ui with Wikilabels 7. https://github.com/wiki-ai/flask-oojsui 8. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150961 -- ORES ui is broken (text field disabled) 9. https://github.com/wiki-ai/ores/issues/177 10. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150544 -- ORES (a 2-3 minute presentation) 11. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151214 -- Basic analysis of Wikipedia quality using monthly predictions 12. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150858 -- Post about ORES review tool including ERI filters 13. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Tflhjj5x1numzg67
Sincerely, Aaron from the Revision Scoring team
I've reached out to Ghassan to try and determine what could have happened here. FWIW, I've been working with Ghassan for a while and I can vouch for his good faith contributions. I'm sure this was a mistake.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Jonathan Morgan jmorgan@wikimedia.org wrote:
excuse me?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Ghassan Maslamani < ghassan.maslamani@gmail.com> wrote:
The fuck AI request, be transparent
On Nov 30, 2016 2:00 PM, ai-request@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
Send AI mailing list submissions to ai@lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ai or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ai-request@lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at ai-owner@lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of AI digest..."
Today's Topics:
- The Revision scoring weekly update (Aaron Halfaker)
Message: 1 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:34:11 -0500 From: Aaron Halfaker aaron.halfaker@gmail.com To: Application of Artificial Intelligence and other advanced computing strategies to Wikimedia Projects < ai@lists.wikimedia.org>, Wikimedia developers wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [AI] The Revision scoring weekly update Message-ID: <CANQe2T_GAqzZYraq7vm+WcSZi+x-1p7K_HP1PTvYgjEUY4_OrQ@mail.gm ail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hey,
This is the 30th and 31st weekly update from the revision scoring team that we have sent to this mailing list. We accidentally skipped a week again.
*New development:*
- We added a new "lowest" sensitivity level to ORES review tool. This
new sensistivity level will only flag edits that ORES is very confident are actually damaging[1].
We applied the MediaWiki standard color palette to Wikilabels[2]
We generated a manually censored public dataset of
spam/vandalism/attack pages[3]. This will help others to develop spam, vandalism and attack page detection models. See the publication of the dataset[4].
- We've implement color-based confidence reporting for ORES damage
detection[5]
*Maintenance and robustness:*
- We updated the version of OOjs-UI that gets bundled with Wiki
labels[6] and moved the static assets to a new repositiory[7]
- We fixed an issue in the recscoring library[8] that caused ORES to
return invalid JSON and rendered the UI useless[9].
*Communications:*
- We gave a 3 minute presentation on the state of ORES to Victoria
Coleman, the WMF's new CTO[10].
- We performed a basic analysis of Wikipedia article quality trends
using the dataset we released a few weeks ago[11]. We'll have a more substantial analysis soon.
- We made a post on the ORES review tool talk page[12,13] detailing
how we plan to incorporate a new filtering strategy into the ORES review tool. Please join the discussion there.
- https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150224 -- Add "Lowest" ORES
sensitivity for fpr=0.1 2. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151119 -- Apply ui standardization color palette to Wikilabels 3. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150307 -- Create manually vetted dataset of spam/vandalism/attack pages 4. https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4245035 5. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T144922 -- Visually report damaging confidence 6. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151222 -- Update bundled OOJS-ui with Wikilabels 7. https://github.com/wiki-ai/flask-oojsui 8. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150961 -- ORES ui is broken (text field disabled) 9. https://github.com/wiki-ai/ores/issues/177 10. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150544 -- ORES (a 2-3 minute presentation) 11. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151214 -- Basic analysis of Wikipedia quality using monthly predictions 12. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150858 -- Post about ORES review tool including ERI filters 13. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Tflhjj5x1numzg67
Sincerely, Aaron from the Revision Scoring team
Makes fucking sense to me! :)
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Aaron Halfaker ahalfaker@wikimedia.org wrote:
I've reached out to Ghassan to try and determine what could have happened here. FWIW, I've been working with Ghassan for a while and I can vouch for his good faith contributions. I'm sure this was a mistake.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Jonathan Morgan jmorgan@wikimedia.org wrote:
excuse me?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Ghassan Maslamani < ghassan.maslamani@gmail.com> wrote:
The fuck AI request, be transparent
On Nov 30, 2016 2:00 PM, ai-request@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
Send AI mailing list submissions to ai@lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ai or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ai-request@lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at ai-owner@lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of AI digest..."
Today's Topics:
- The Revision scoring weekly update (Aaron Halfaker)
Message: 1 Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:34:11 -0500 From: Aaron Halfaker aaron.halfaker@gmail.com To: Application of Artificial Intelligence and other advanced computing strategies to Wikimedia Projects < ai@lists.wikimedia.org>, Wikimedia developers wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [AI] The Revision scoring weekly update Message-ID: <CANQe2T_GAqzZYraq7vm+WcSZi+x-1p7K_HP1PTvYgjEUY4_OrQ@mail.gm ail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hey,
This is the 30th and 31st weekly update from the revision scoring team that we have sent to this mailing list. We accidentally skipped a week again.
*New development:*
- We added a new "lowest" sensitivity level to ORES review tool.
This new sensistivity level will only flag edits that ORES is very confident are actually damaging[1].
We applied the MediaWiki standard color palette to Wikilabels[2]
We generated a manually censored public dataset of
spam/vandalism/attack pages[3]. This will help others to develop spam, vandalism and attack page detection models. See the publication of the dataset[4].
- We've implement color-based confidence reporting for ORES damage
detection[5]
*Maintenance and robustness:*
- We updated the version of OOjs-UI that gets bundled with Wiki
labels[6] and moved the static assets to a new repositiory[7]
- We fixed an issue in the recscoring library[8] that caused ORES to
return invalid JSON and rendered the UI useless[9].
*Communications:*
- We gave a 3 minute presentation on the state of ORES to Victoria
Coleman, the WMF's new CTO[10].
- We performed a basic analysis of Wikipedia article quality trends
using the dataset we released a few weeks ago[11]. We'll have a more substantial analysis soon.
- We made a post on the ORES review tool talk page[12,13] detailing
how we plan to incorporate a new filtering strategy into the ORES review tool. Please join the discussion there.
- https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150224 -- Add "Lowest" ORES
sensitivity for fpr=0.1 2. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151119 -- Apply ui standardization color palette to Wikilabels 3. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150307 -- Create manually vetted dataset of spam/vandalism/attack pages 4. https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4245035 5. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T144922 -- Visually report damaging confidence 6. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151222 -- Update bundled OOJS-ui with Wikilabels 7. https://github.com/wiki-ai/flask-oojsui 8. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150961 -- ORES ui is broken (text field disabled) 9. https://github.com/wiki-ai/ores/issues/177 10. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150544 -- ORES (a 2-3 minute presentation) 11. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151214 -- Basic analysis of Wikipedia quality using monthly predictions 12. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150858 -- Post about ORES review tool including ERI filters 13. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Tflhjj5x1numzg67
Sincerely, Aaron from the Revision Scoring team