excuse me?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Ghassan Maslamani <
ghassan.maslamani(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The fuck AI request, be transparent
On Nov 30, 2016 2:00 PM, <ai-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Send AI mailing list submissions to
> ai(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ai
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ai-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> ai-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of AI digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. The Revision scoring weekly update (Aaron Halfaker)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:34:11 -0500
> From: Aaron Halfaker <aaron.halfaker(a)gmail.com>
> To: Application of Artificial Intelligence and other advanced
> computing strategies to Wikimedia Projects <
> ai(a)lists.wikimedia.org>gt;,
> Wikimedia developers <wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
> Subject: [AI] The Revision scoring weekly update
> Message-ID:
> <CANQe2T_GAqzZYraq7vm+WcSZi+x-1p7K_HP1PTvYgjEUY4_OrQ(a)mail.gm
> ail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hey,
>
> This is the 30th and 31st weekly update from the revision scoring team
> that
> we have sent to this mailing list. We accidentally skipped a week again.
>
> *New development:*
>
> - We added a new "lowest" sensitivity level to ORES review tool. This
> new sensistivity level will only flag edits that ORES is very
> confident are
> actually damaging[1].
>
>
> - We applied the MediaWiki standard color palette to Wikilabels[2]
>
>
> - We generated a manually censored public dataset of
> spam/vandalism/attack pages[3]. This will help others to develop spam,
> vandalism and attack page detection models. See the publication of the
> dataset[4].
>
>
> - We've implement color-based confidence reporting for ORES damage
> detection[5]
>
>
> *Maintenance and robustness:*
>
> - We updated the version of OOjs-UI that gets bundled with Wiki
> labels[6] and moved the static assets to a new repositiory[7]
>
>
> - We fixed an issue in the recscoring library[8] that caused ORES to
> return invalid JSON and rendered the UI useless[9].
>
>
> *Communications:*
>
> - We gave a 3 minute presentation on the state of ORES to Victoria
> Coleman, the WMF's new CTO[10].
>
>
> - We performed a basic analysis of Wikipedia article quality trends
> using the dataset we released a few weeks ago[11]. We'll have a more
> substantial analysis soon.
>
>
> - We made a post on the ORES review tool talk page[12,13] detailing how
> we plan to incorporate a new filtering strategy into the ORES review
> tool.
> Please join the discussion there.
>
>
> 1.
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150224 -- Add "Lowest" ORES
> sensitivity for fpr=0.1
> 2.
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151119 -- Apply ui standardization
> color palette to Wikilabels
> 3.
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150307 -- Create manually vetted
> dataset of spam/vandalism/attack pages
> 4.
https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4245035
> 5.
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T144922 -- Visually report damaging
> confidence
> 6.
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151222 -- Update bundled OOJS-ui
> with
> Wikilabels
> 7.
https://github.com/wiki-ai/flask-oojsui
> 8.
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150961 -- ORES ui is broken (text
> field disabled)
> 9.
https://github.com/wiki-ai/ores/issues/177
> 10.
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150544 -- ORES (a 2-3 minute
> presentation)
> 11.
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T151214 -- Basic analysis of
> Wikipedia quality using monthly predictions
> 12.
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T150858 -- Post about ORES review
> tool including ERI filters
> 13.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Tflhjj5x1numzg67
>
> Sincerely,
> Aaron from the Revision Scoring team
>