There has been research that encourages users to participate in studies by posting on their user page [1]. But it might be worth to ask about experiences on Research-l. Let me know how it goes, I would be very interested in the results, as I am looking into working on a similar approach!
Best, Lucie
[1] The Wikipedia Adventure: Field Evaluation of an Interactive Tutorial for New Users https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2998307
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 14:40, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I suggest that you ask questions about research Research-l: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
You could also ask at a relevant English Wikipedia village pump.
Pine ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 5:38 PM Maximilian Klein max@notconfusing.com wrote:
Hello All,
I have created a new labelling campaign, "Newcomer Session Quality" which describes observes the *sessions* (temporally related edits) of users on their *registration day* [1]. The idea is to detect potentially productive newcomers may be struggling with onboarding and might otherwise get bitten. I was wondering if there was a standard way to advertise for volunteers for a new campaign on-wiki? Would it be OK to leave talk-page invitations to users who have signed up for updates on other campaigns [2]? By the way, right now the campaign is just in enwiki for testing, but I have 6 other languages ready to go if enwiki labelling goes well.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Labels/Newcomer_session_quality [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Labels/Edit_quality
Make a great day, Max Klein ‽ http://notconfusing.com/ _______________________________________________ AI mailing list AI@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ai
AI mailing list AI@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ai