There has been research that encourages users to participate in studies by
posting on their user page [1].
But it might be worth to ask about experiences on Research-l. Let me know
how it goes, I would be very interested in the results, as I am looking
into working on a similar approach!
Best,
Lucie
[1] The Wikipedia Adventure: Field Evaluation of an Interactive Tutorial
for New Users
https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2998307
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 14:40, Pine W <wiki.pine(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, I suggest that you ask questions about research
Research-l:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
You could also ask at a relevant English Wikipedia village pump.
Pine
(
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 5:38 PM Maximilian Klein <max(a)notconfusing.com>
wrote:
Hello All,
I have created a new labelling campaign, "Newcomer Session Quality" which
describes observes the *sessions* (temporally related edits) of users on
their *registration day* [1]. The idea is to detect potentially
productive newcomers may be struggling with onboarding and might otherwise
get bitten. I was wondering if there was a standard way to advertise for
volunteers for a new campaign on-wiki? Would it be OK to leave talk-page
invitations to users who have signed up for updates on other campaigns [2]?
By the way, right now the campaign is just in enwiki for testing, but I
have 6 other languages ready to go if enwiki labelling goes well.
[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Labels/Newcomer_session_quality
[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Labels/Edit_quality
Make a great day,
Max Klein ‽
http://notconfusing.com/
_______________________________________________
AI mailing list
AI(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ai
_______________________________________________
AI mailing list
AI(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ai
--
Lucie-Aimée Kaffee