There has been research that encourages users to participate in studies by posting on their user page [1].
But it might be worth to ask about experiences on Research-l. Let me know how it goes, I would be very interested in the results, as I am looking into working on a similar approach!

Best,
Lucie

[1] The Wikipedia Adventure: Field Evaluation of an Interactive Tutorial for New Users https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2998307

On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 14:40, Pine W <wiki.pine@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, I suggest that you ask questions about research Research-l: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

You could also ask at a relevant English Wikipedia village pump.



On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 5:38 PM Maximilian Klein <max@notconfusing.com> wrote:
Hello All,

I have created a new labelling campaign, "Newcomer Session Quality" which describes observes the sessions (temporally related edits) of users on their registration day [1]. The idea is to detect potentially productive newcomers may be struggling with onboarding and might otherwise get bitten. I was wondering if there was a standard way to advertise for volunteers for a new campaign on-wiki? Would it be OK to leave talk-page invitations to users who have signed up for updates on other campaigns [2]? By the way, right now the campaign is just in enwiki for testing, but I have 6 other languages ready to go if enwiki labelling goes well.


Make a great day,
Max Klein ‽ http://notconfusing.com/
_______________________________________________
AI mailing list
AI@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ai
_______________________________________________
AI mailing list
AI@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ai


--
Lucie-Aimée Kaffee